If you study the actions of the tabloids -- what they've chosen to print, and what they've demonised for being in print -- we can build up a solid picture of when it is and is not appropriate to leer over certain people. And by 'people', I mean 'women', obviously.
It is NOT appropriate to perv if the subject is:
- An heir-giving princess in the nude.
- An heir-giving princess wearing a bikini while pregnant.
- The Queen (probably? untested)
It is entirely fine to perv if the subject is:
- An heir-giving princess in a bikini while not pregnant
- An heir-giving princess in underwear
- An heir-giving princess, pregnant, but not in a bikini
- A princess (Eugenie and Beatrice are often papped at the beach due to their large bosoms)
- A celebrity consensually modelling for photographs
- A celebrity out in public
- A celebrity doing something so outrageous that they have to show you all the details just so you can understand exactly how outraged to be
- A celebrity, shot from a long lens on a private holiday
- A pregnant celebrity
- A pregnant celebrity in a bikini
- A celebrity, who's large breasts might mean cleavage is inevitable
- A celebrity's accidentally exposed body parts
- A celebrity's teenage daughter
- A celebrity's pre-pubsecent daughter
- A celebrity's infant daughter
- A celebrity's foetus
- An underage celebrity (link is particularly "hilarious")
- A teenage celebrity (there are somany of these I didn't know where to start)
- A child celebrity
- A recently murdered celebrity
- The wife of a head of state
- An A-Level student, having received your results (especially after being pimped out by your own school)
- A sports professional
- A woman
- A woman whose weight fluctuates
- A woman who's too thin
- A woman who's too fat
- A woman wearing flattering clothing
- A woman wearing inappropriate clothing for her body
So that's that sorted, then.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please try not to be a complete loser when commenting.